Tuesday, October 23, 2012

History 111 first paper


What is considered a Good Life in Ancient Civilizations?

             The Egyptians, Mesopotamians and Harrapans led very different lives and had different beliefs. From the primary sources, Egyptian Book of the Dead, Hammurabi’s Code and the Bhagvad Gita, I will compare and contrast the different cultures based on religion and the development of their land.  Since their spiritual devotion was so great and the growth of their land was so vast, this determined their fortunate ways of living and gave them the ability to expand their culture and the moral ways of their daily lives.

Let’s start with agriculture, the main thing all these ancient civilizations have in common.  The Egyptians they had the Nile River and the Mesopotamians had the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. But only the Egyptians were able to gain from the annual floods. The floods allowed the Egyptians to take care of their land without extensive care and it also gave them the privilege to harvest crops in the winter.  Egyptians also had domesticated animals, mainly cattle and donkeys. Later form the increase of human population the Egyptians had to form a more advance agriculture system. In 4000 BCE villages along the Nile traded regularly and even cooperated in building an irrigation system. (Traditions and Encounters pg. 52). The canal irrigation was a simple process that didn’t require much work or organization. (World of History pg.47)

                                                                                                Brown 2

Contrast to the Egyptians, the Mesopotamians had to struggle in order to get their crops. The Mesopotamians developed a small irrigation system in 6000 BCE which helped them dig fields of barley, wheat and peas. (Traditions and Encounters pg.26) “In Mesopotamia the flood was the enemy….The forces of nature where often evil. Life was a struggle”. To fix this economic problem was the beginning of a city-state society. (World of History pg.47)

The Mesopotamians and Egyptians well fertile grounds led to an increase in population and from that, a formal government. And because the population increased so much, social classes began to developed .Unlike the Mesopotamians the Egyptians didn’t face any outside threats. Nonetheless, in order to create a peaceful place and maintain order, the Egyptians created small kingdoms and states and had some government control reign over them. (Traditions and Encounters pg. 52) 

Mesopotamia had a ruling class of kings and nobles who earned their positions by being successful soldiers. Hammurabi was one of the most prominent rulers of Mesopotamia, mostly due to his “most extensive and most complete Mesopotamian law code” the Hammurabi Code. (Traditions and Encounters pg. 29)This code gives of the insight on how the Mesopotamians lived their daily lives. “The law code gives us an idea of a people’s sense of justice and notions of proper punishment”. (World of History pg.58) The main punishment for breaking Hammurabi’s Law was death.He prescribed the death penalty for theft, fraud, murder, runaway slaves, adultery, false accusations and failure to obey authority. With laws like these, Hammurabi established high standards of moral behavior. (Traditions and Encounter pgs.29-30)

 

                                                                                                Brown 3

Now let’s move on to the Harrapans. The Harrapans, just like Mesopotamia and Egypt, developed its society along a river and their river was the Indus River. Unfortunately it’s impossible to follow the development of the Harrapans society or figure out what kind of political organization they had   due to the lack of written records. Everything we know of them is based highly on archeological study. 

The Indus river was very much similar to the Nile.It drew it waters from the rain and would carry an enormous quantity of silt and deposits it into the rich soil. The Harrapans got most of their food crops and domesticated animals from Mesopotamia. And just like the Mesopotamians, the Harrapans would have to sow their seeds of wheat and barley. The Harrapans where the first society to domesticate chickens.  Around 5000 BCE they cultivated cotton and dyed cloth came into the picture around 2000 BCE. Not only did the Harrapans have a success in agriculture, they also had a wealthy trade by trading domesticated and foreign items. From neighboring city Persia, the Harrappans obtained gold, silver, copper, lead, gems and stones

  Just like the Mesopotamians and the Egyptians, India also had a vast food supply which stimulated the human population, and along with that came cities and labor. (Traditions and Encounters pg. 72) They even formed the caste system which is a group of people who will eat together and marry one another in their same social rank. The Harrapans formed the caste system for three other reasons beyond controlling the human population:

1)                      They didn’t want someone of the upper class to become “unclean” by coming in contact with the lower class.

Brown 4

2)                       They didn’t want outsiders to feel compelled to follow the customs of the native born people.

3)                      “The doctrine of reincarnation and of varna” They saw the caste “as a divinely established institution, hereditary from father to son”

They believed that if you were meant to be in a higher class then you would be if performed your proper duties in life. If you didn’t perform your duties even a lower class citizen could become a worm or a swine. And someone from a higher class could become the same. (World of history pgs. 85-86)

 

                        Now that we learned about the start and further development of these civilizations, we can move on to religion. The number one thing all of these civilizations had in common was that they were polytheistic. They believed in different Gods and Goddess and each one affected theses civilizations in many ways. For example, the Egyptian god Hapi, flooded their lands and gave them their daily bread. (World of History pg. 47). The ruling God Osiris was the one the Egyptians served vigorously. He was the god of immortality and of the underworld. He was the one who judge the deceased in order to decide their fate beyond death. Before one could be judged, they would have to present a speech to Osiris from the Egyptian: Book of the Dead which tells us what people did or what they didn’t do. They say things like “I have commanded no evil upon me” “I have not killed” “I have made no one weep”. In the end their hearts are judged against a feather. If the deceased heart is lighter, they spent eternity in the

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Brown 5

afterlife. If not, his heart would be devoured by the demon Ammut, if that happened, his existence will end forever. (World of History pgs. 67, 69)

For the Mesopotamians they had priest who did the gods work. The priests were responsible for the sacrifices and rituals that were essential for the help of the gods. In addition, property belonged to the gods so priests administered it. This made the priests valuable and important in their communities. (World of History pg.48)

            The main religion in ancient India was Hinduism: “the belief that animals and human castes were created out of the primal sacrifice of the god Pursha”. The Bhagavad Gita is a story of the warrior Arjuna who was questioning the battle he was about to enter and whether he should kill or not. Then lord Krishna appears to him and explains the concept of death, the caste system, reincarnation and devotion. He explains death is certain for everyone and avoiding it is impossible. He explains that Arjuna must fight because he is a warrior. “Look to your own duty; do not tremble before it; nothing is better for a warrior than a battle of sacred duty”. Krishna continues to say any man who forsakes his sacred duty shall be shamed.  Krishna uses a metaphor about changing clothes to make his point; “As a man discards worn-out clothes to put on new and different ones so the embodied self discards its worn-out bodies to take on other new one” When  someone dies their old body is discarded and they become a new. For the Hindu gods it didn’t matter if you were wealthy and powerful or a dirty criminal, if you were devoted you were considered virtuous. “If he is devoted solely to me, even a violent criminal must be deemed a man of virtue, for his resolve is right”. “Keep me in your mind

 

                                                                                                            Brown 6

And devotion, sacrifice to me, bow to me, discipline yourself toward me, and you will reach me!”  (World of History pgs. 98, 99, 101)

            In my opinion each of these civilizations had a pretty good life. Because they had fertile lands and a vast human population they were able to improve their city-states and continue their devotion to their gods. But like all civilizations, they came to an end. However, their stories still continue today and the artwork that they made is still being looked at today.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment